28462
Caregiver Viewing Patterns during Infant-Caregiver Dyadic Interactions
Objectives: To examine and quantify caregivers’ visual scanning of infant faces during dyadic interactions with TD infants and infants with ASD.
Methods: Eye-tracking data were collected from caregivers and their 2- to 6-month-old infants during three 30-second interactions via closed-circuit live video feed. Diagnostic evaluations at 24 and 36 months were used to separate participants into two groups: caregivers whose infants received an ASD diagnosis at outcome (n=6), and those whose infants were TD and had no family history of ASD (n=6) (Table 1). Caregiver eye-tracking fixation locations were coded relative to four mutually exclusive regions of interest (ROIs): eyes, mouth, nose/body, and background.
Results: To compare caregiver fixation patterns across groups, we performed a repeated-measures ANOVA with diagnosis as a between-subjects factor and ROI as a within-subjects factor. We observed a significant main effect of ROI (p<0.001), with caregivers fixating more on their infant’s eyes than mouths, and more on infant’s mouths than bodies (all p’s<.05). The diagnosis by ROI interaction trended towards significance (p=0.096). Exploratory independent-samples t-tests revealed a trend towards increased mouth-looking in caregivers of TD infants compared to caregivers of infants with ASD (p=0.067) (Figure 1).
Conclusions: Preliminary analyses provide the first exploration of caregiver viewing patterns during infant-caregiver dyadic interactions, revealing that caregivers spend more time fixating on their infant’s eyes, followed by mouth, and body. Immediate next steps include increasing the sample size to further investigate the observed trend towards increased mouth-looking in caregivers of TD infants. Additionally, longitudinal analyses of infant affect, facial cues, and vocalizations will be completed to identify specific infant signals that influence moment-by-moment shifting of caregiver visual attention. These analyses have important implications for understanding how early disruptions to interactive contingency within the infant-caregiver dyad may impact subsequent development in infants with ASD.