Objectives: The question of untapped cognitive potential is perhaps particularly important for low functioning individuals with ASD. In an attempt to replicate the Schueffgen et al study in a sample of individuals with autism and severe intellectual impairment, the present study aimed to examine the relation (or lack of) between IT and IQ in autism. In particular, it was hypothesized that participants with ASD and low measured IQ would show faster speed of processing than participants with low measured IQ but not ASD.
Methods: 47 participants with Intellectual Disability (ID) and 33 participants with ASD and additional ID between the ages of 6 and 19 completed both the Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPM) and a visual IT task. Both tasks were adapted in order to accommodate the low level of ability in participant groups.
Results: Preliminary results show that the ASD group performed faster at the IT task than the ID group, however this difference was not significant. After comparing groups matched by mental-age, the difference remained non-significant. Contrary to expectations, a significant relationship between IT and intellectual ability (CPM raw scores) were found in both the ASD and the ID groups.
Conclusions: These findings support the hypothesis proposed by Scheuffgen et al (2000); who state that individuals with ASD have an intact basic processing mechanism (as in Anderson’s model of minimal cognitive architecture) or “g”, but that low measured IQ scores result from a failure in theory of mind mechanisms, impeding them to access information through social means. In our study, the social and communicative constrains were reduced by using a measure of pure fluid intelligence. These results could imply a future difference in the way the low end of the autistic spectrum is conceptualized and assessed.
See more of: Cognition and Behavior
See more of: Symptoms, Diagnosis & Phenotype