28650
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) in Acute Care Settings
Objectives: This study investigates the sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS-2 when administered in an acute psychiatric care setting.
Methods: Participants were selected from the Rhode Island Consortium for Autism Research and Treatment (RI-CART), a state-wide registry of individuals diagnosed with ASD or related neuro-developmental disorders. Selected RI-CART participants (n = 80; 70% male, Mean Age = 11.5, sd = 2.9) were enrolled in the registry while admitted to either a pediatric psychiatric inpatient unit (n = 11) or partial hospital program (n = 69); assessment was acquired during admission. Assessments included an ADOS-2 administered by a research-reliable examiner, and other cognitive (K-BIT 2), emotional/behavioral (SRS-2), and adaptive measures (VABS). Parents completed a demographics form. A confirmed diagnosis of ASD was indicated if participants medical charts contained an active diagnosis of ASD and ADOS-2 results were positive for ASD (n = 34). Additional data derived from the Autism and Developmental Disorders Inpatient Collaborative (ADDIRC; n = 736 with confirmed ASD diagnosis and positive ADOS-2; n = 178 with discordant clinical diagnosis and ADOS-2 scores) is being prepared and subsequent analysis will include: 1) more in-depth examination of demographics characteristics, 2) second sensitivity and specificity analysis with the full sample, 2) an examination of individual ADOS-2 items that reliably distinguish between ASD positive and ASD negative participants and, 3) a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to examine how alternative algorithm cut-offs may increase the sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS-2 when used in acute care settings.
Results: Participants presented with numerous psychiatric comorbidities (mean = 2.7, range 1-5 psychiatric dx). Preliminary data include 51 Module 3 and 29 Module 4 ADOS-3 results. In this sample, the Module 3 algorithm produced a sensitivity of 36% and a specificity of 79%; Module 4 algorithm produced a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 71%. No differences in sensitivity and specificity were attributed to participants’ gender (p = 0.17).
Conclusions: Results from these analyses suggest that sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS-2 may be lower in acute care compared to previous findings in outpatient samples. This, combined with upcoming analysis examining alternative algorithm cut-offs, aim to provide clinical diagnostic guidelines to improve the accuracy of the ADOS-2 when used in acute care.
See more of: Diagnostic, Behavioral & Intellectual Assessment