31777
Functional Connectivity during Language Processing in Infants at Familial Risk for ASD

Panel Presentation
Friday, May 3, 2019: 3:55 PM
Room: 524 (Palais des congres de Montreal)
X. A. Tran1, A. H. Dickinson1, N. M. McDonald2, M. Dapretto3 and S. Jeste1, (1)University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, (2)UCLA Center for Autism Research and Treatment, Los Angeles, CA, (3)Dept of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a disorder of connectivity, with ASD genes converging to disrupt neural development and cortical connectivity prenatally. Familial-risk infants, defined by having at least 1 older sibling with ASD, have increased risks for ASD and language delay (Messinger 2013). Neuroimaging studies have identified abnormal structural and functional connectivity in FR infants at 6 months that relate to future ASD symptoms (Shen 2017). No prior study has examined connectivity during language processing in familial-risk infants longitudinally throughout the first year of life.

Objectives: We asked if EEG connectivity, as measured by phase coherence, during language processing, (1) differentiates infants based on risk status and ASD symptoms during the first year of life (at 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month), and (2) relates to 18-month language ability and ASD symptoms. We hypothesized that atypical connectivity during language processing is detectable at 3 months of age in infants who will have 18-month behavioral-concerns for ASD.

Methods: Participants included 49 familial-risk and 35 low-risk infants, who were divided into ASD-concern and No-concern groups based on their 18-month ADOS-T calibrated severity score (scores ≥ 4 are ASD-concern). 18-month groupings included 17 ASD-concern and 54 No-concern infants. EEG was acquired longitudinally (at 3, 6, 9, and 12-month) while infants listened passively to a continuous stream of syllables for 2.5 minutes (EGI 128 channels). EEG was collected using NetStation and filtered at 1.5-50 Hz. To maximally reduce artifacts, EEG data were cleaned using EEGLAB artifact subspace reconstruction, 1-model adaptive mixture independent component analysis, and transformed to current source density. Using newcrossf, phase coherence was calculated in the theta (4-6 Hz), alpha (6-12 Hz) and gamma (30-50 Hz) bands between 39 electrode pairs in putative language networks (Figure 1). Language ability and ASD symptoms were assessed at 18-month using Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MCDI), the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Toddler Module (ADOS-T).

Results: All statistics for coherence analyses are provided in Table 1. Phase coherence differentiated ASD-concern from No-concern infants cross-sectionally at 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month. Compared to ASD-concern infants, No-concern infants had higher phase coherence across theta, alpha and gamma bands in multiple frontal-posterior, frontal-temporal and frontal-central electrode pairs throughout the first year of life. At electrode pairs that differentiated risk-groups, greater phase coherence predicted greater language ability and reduced ASD symptoms at 18-month.

Conclusions: Neural connectivity during auditory language processing in early infancy likely supports subsequent language development. This study documents the earliest manifestation of altered connectivity during language processing in familial-risk infants. Hypoconnectivity during language processing could serve as an early marker of atypical neurodevelopmental trajectories. Ongoing work with this study will include longitudinal modelling of 3-month through 12-month timepoints to examine potential divergent developmental trajectories in infants with atypical development.