31028
Accumulated Experiences of a Dutch Autism Expert Team for Toddlers & Pre-Schoolers

Poster Presentation
Friday, May 3, 2019: 11:30 AM-1:30 PM
Room: 710 (Palais des congres de Montreal)
M. Buruma and E. M. Blijd-Hoogewys, INTER-PSY, Groningen, Netherlands
Background:

Although diagnosing a child with ASD is possible at a young age, the diagnostic process is complex. For, the child is subject to rapid behavioral developmental changes and potential regressions, and is very sensitive to changes in its immediate environment. Therefore, it is important to do an extensive and thorough assessment.

International guidelines for ASD diagnosis in young children recommend: 1) a multidisciplinary specialist autism team, preferably consisting of a pediatrician/clinical psychiatrist, a psychologist, and a speech therapist, 2) working with experts in autism diagnostics and young children, 3) a case coordinator, 4) start assessment within 3 months after referral, 5) using different information sources (home life, nursery/playground/school, …), 6) mapping physical health and medical history, and 7) consideration of co-morbidity and differential diagnostics.

Diagnostic assessment exists of questioning parental concerns (based on child behavior in various environments), a developmental history (specifically aimed at joint attention skills, executive functioning and sensory information processing), skill observation(s), details on day-to-day functioning (home life and day care/education), a medical history and a profile of strengths and weaknesses (including cognition and language) (Dutch clinical best estimate, 2017).

Objectives:

Sharing clinical experience in diagnosing ASD in young children.

Methods:

Our team exists of 18 professionals: 1 child psychiatrist, 1 pediatrician, 1 clinical psychologist, 4 health care psychologists, 5 (educational) psychologists, 1 speech/language therapist, 3 home treatment specialists, 1 play therapist, and 1 case coordinator.

From April 2013 until May 2018, we assessed 360 children, following the above mentioned guidelines for autism diagnostics in young children, also using the ADOS-2, language and intelligence tests. Observations were done both at our center (structured play), at home (free play) and at day care or school.

Results:

Of the 360 children, 72% were boys and 28% girls. We regularly see children from other cultures (e.g. African, Antillean, South American, Eastern European, Filipino, Indian, Pakistani and Russian).

The first assessment occurred on average 2 weeks after referral. In 58%, an ASD diagnosis was confirmed. In the youngest children, often a DC0-5 diagnosis was made, which at a later age, after reassessment, was often changed into ASD. In 14% of the cases, no diagnosis was made. These children were kept under review. Reassessment occurred in 34% of the children, which occurred 1-2 years later, when new concerns were raised.

Co-morbidity was often present, such as a developmental delay (45%) or language deficits (55%). Often, there were additional problems concerning sleeping, eating, potty training, motor skills and/or parent-child interaction. Children were regularly referred to clinical genetics, to look into underlying genetic causes.

Over the years, we came to see more girls with ASD. Their profile seems somewhat different.

Conclusions:

Despite the good reliability of ASD classifications at a young age, it is important to keep track of children in their development and to evaluate them regularly. Re-assessment is strongly recommended in young children (<4 years), because the development of young children is rapid. Cognitive and language skills are still developing strongly and there is a great intertwining with the environment.